Valoración de resultados tras 112 radioembolizaciones con 90Y-microesferas / Evaluation of results after 112 radioembolizations with 90Y-microspheres

Objetivo Para conocer los resultados de la radioembolización (transarterial radioembolization o TARE), en el tratamiento de tumores hepáticos, se realizó una valoración retrospectiva tras 112 TARE con 90Y-microesferas administradas en 82 pacientes en un único hospital, analizando la eficacia y la seguridad, tras un seguimiento mayor o igual a 1 año post-TARE en todos los pacientes, y evaluando la posible relación entre la respuesta al tratamiento y la supervivencia de los pacientes. Material y métodos Se administraron 57 TARE únicas y 55 TARE múltiples en pacientes con hepatocarcinoma (53), metástasis hepáticas (25) y colangiocarcinoma (4), con evaluación previa multidisciplinar clínica, angiográfica y gammagráfica (planar/SPECT/SPECT-TC con 99mTc-MAA), modelo multicompartimental (ecuaciones MIRD), valoración gammagráfica post-TARE (planar/SPECT/SPECT-TC), seguimiento clínico-radiológico, evaluación de respuesta tumoral (criterios mRECIST) y análisis (Kaplan Meier) de supervivencia libre de progresión (SLP) y supervivencia global (SG). Resultados La intención terapéutica fue paliativa (82%) y como puente a trasplante hepático/resección quirúrgica (17%). Se obtuvo respuesta (R), completa o parcial, en el 65,9% de los casos. Al año post-TARE estaban libres de progresión el 34,7% de los pacientes con R y 19,2% de los no R (p:0,003), con SG del 80% para los R y 37,5% para los no R (p:0,001). Las curvas de supervivencia mostraron mediana de SG de 18 meses (95% IC 15,7-20,3) para los R y 9 meses (95% IC 6,1-11,8) para los no R (p:0,03). Efectos secundarios leves (27,6%) y severos (5,3%) resueltos, sin mayor incidencia tras TARE múltiple. Conclusiones La TARE con 90Y-microesferas en pacientes adecuadamente seleccionados con tumores hepáticos, aporta eficacia terapéutica y bajo índice de toxicidad, con SLP y SG superiores en los pacientes con respuesta a la TARE respecto a los que no respondieron (AU)

Aim To determine the results of radioembolization transarterial (TARE), in the treatment of liver tumors, a retrospective evaluation was performed after 112 TARE with 90Y-microspheres administered in 82 patients in a single hospital, analyzing efficacy and safety, after a follow-up greater than or equal to 1 year post-TARE in all patients, and evaluating the possible relationship between treatment response and patient survival Material and methods We have administered 57 single TARE and 55 multiple TARE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (53), liver metastases (25) and cholangiocarcinoma (4), with prior multidisciplinary evaluation, clinical, angiographic and gammagraphic (planar/SPECT/SPECT-CT with 99mTc-MAA), multicompartment model (MIRD equations), post-TARE screening (planar/SPECT/SPECT-CT), clinical and radiological follow-up, tumor response evaluation (mRECIST criteria) and Kaplan–Meier analysis to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Therapeutic intention was palliative (82%) and as bridge to liver transplantation/surgical resection (17%). We obtained response (R), complete or partial, in 65.9% of cases. One year after TARE 34.7% of patients with R and 19.2% of non-R were progression-free (p: 0.003), with OS of 80% for R and 37.5% for non-R (p: 0.001). Survival analysis showed median OS of 18 months (95% CI 15.7–20.3) for R and 9 months (95% CI 6.1–11.8) for non-R (p: 0.03). We found mild (27.6%) and severe (5.3%) side effects, all of them resolved, without higher incidence after multiple TARE. Conclusion TARE with 90Y-microspheres, in appropriately selected patients with liver tumors, provides therapeutic efficacy and low rate of toxicity, with higher PFS and OS in patients with TARE response compared to those who did not respond (AU)

Cirugía y radioembolización de tumores hepáticos / Surgery and radioembolization of liver tumors

La resección quirúrgica se considera el tratamiento curativo por excelencia para los pacientes con tumores hepáticos primarios o metastásicos. Sin embargo, menos de 40% de ellos son candidatos a cirugía, ya sea por factores no modificables (comorbilidades, edad, disfunción hepática…), como por la invasión o proximidad del tumor a los principales pedículos vasculares, la falta de un futuro remanente hepático (FRH) adecuado para mantener una función hepática postoperatoria, o criterios de tamaño y numero tumoral. En estos últimos factores, la radioembolización hepática ha mostrado tener un papel como herramienta prequirúrgica, ya sea mediante la hipertrofia del FRH o mediante la reducción del tamaño tumoral que consigue disminuir la estadificación tumoral (término conocido como «downstaging»). A estos se suma un tercer factor, que es su capacidad de aplicar el test del tiempo, que permite identificar aquellos pacientes que presenten en un plazo corto de tiempo progresión de la enfermedad (tanto a nivel local como a distancia), evitándoles una cirugía innecesaria. En este trabajo se pretende hacer una revisión de la radioembolización como herramienta facilitadora de la cirugía hepática, tanto a través de la experiencia de nuestro centro como de la evidencia científica disponible (AU)

Surgical resection is considered the curative treatment par excellence for patients with primary or metastatic liver tumors. However, less than 40% of them are candidates for surgery, either due to non-modifiable factors (comorbidities, age, liver dysfunction...), or to the invasion or proximity of the tumor to the main vascular requirements, the lack of a future liver remnant (FLR) adequate to maintain postoperative liver function, or criteria of tumor size and number. In these last factors, hepatic radioembolization has been shown to play a role as a presurgical tool, either by hypertrophy of the FLR or by reducing tumor size that manages to reduce tumor staging (term known as “downstaging”). To these is added a third factor, which is its ability to apply the test of time, which makes it possible to identify those patients who present progression of the disease in a short period of time (both locally and at distance), avoiding a unnecessary surgery. This paper aims to review RE as a tool to facilitate liver surgery, both through the experience of our center and the available scientific evidence (AU)

Surgery and radioembolization of liver tumors.

Surgical resection is considered the curative treatment par excellence for patients with primary or metastatic liver tumors. However, less than 40% of them are candidates for surgery, either due to non-modifiable factors (comorbidities, age, liver dysfunction…), or to the invasion or proximity of the tumor to the main vascular requirements, the lack of a future liver remnant (FLR) adequate to maintain postoperative liver function, or criteria of tumor size and number. In these last factors, hepatic radioembolization has been shown to play a role as a presurgical tool, either by hypertrophy of the FLR or by reducing tumor size that manages to reduce tumor staging (term known as "downstaging"). To these is added a third factor, which is its ability to apply the test of time, which makes it possible to identify those patients who present progression of the disease in a short period of time (both locally and at distance), avoiding a unnecessary surgery. This paper aims to review RE as a tool to facilitate liver surgery, both through the experience of our center and the available scientific evidence.

Evaluation of results after 112 radioembolizations with 90Y-microspheres.

AIM: To determine the results of radioembolization transarterial (TARE), in the treatment of liver tumors, a retrospective evaluation was performed after 112 TARE with 90Y-microspheres administered in 82 patients in a single hospital, analyzing efficacy and safety, after a follow-up greater than or equal to 1 year post-TARE in all patients, and evaluating the possible relationship between treatment response and patient survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have administered 57 single TARE and 55 multiple TARE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (53), liver metastases (25) and cholangiocarcinoma (4), with prior multidisciplinary evaluation, clinical, angiographic and gammagraphic (planar/SPECT/SPECT-CT with 99mTc-MAA), multicompartment model (MIRD equations), post-TARE screening (planar/SPECT/SPECT-CT), clinical and radiological follow-up, tumor response evaluation (mRECIST criteria) and Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Therapeutic intention was palliative (82%) and as bridge to liver transplantation/surgical resection (17%). We obtained response (R), complete or partial, in 65.9% of cases. One year after TARE 34.7% of patients with R and 19.2% of non-R were progression-free (P: .003), with OS of 80% for R and 37.5% for non-R (P: .001). Survival analysis showed median OS of 18 months (95% CI 15.7-20.3) for R and 9 months (95% CI 6.1-11.8) for non-R (P: .03). We found mild (27.6%) and severe (5.3%) side effects, all of them resolved, without higher incidence after multiple TARE. CONCLUSION: TARE with 90Y-microspheres, in appropriately selected patients with liver tumors, provides therapeutic efficacy and low rate of toxicity, with higher PFS and OS in patients with TARE response compared to those who did not respond.

Radioembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a series of 53 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To contribute our results to increase the scientific evidence about the use of radioembolization in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 53 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radioembolization at our center. Patients were classified according to the BCLC algorithm in detail according to their Child-Pugh functional status. We analyzed survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. We used Cox regression analysis to determine clinically significant parameters, including the doses administered in the parameters studied. RESULTS: Patients ranged in age from 28 to 86 years (mean, 60 years). A total of 61 procedures were done. The mean activity administered was 2.8GBq (0.7-6.4GBq), with a mean dose of 229.9Gy (74-425.9Gy) administered in the tumor. Progression-free survival was 6.7 months and overall survival was 12.8 months. Differences in disease-free survival according to BCLC and Child-Pugh classification were not significant (p=0.848 and p=0.252, respectively). The clinical parameters that were significantly different with respect to overall survival were bilirubin levels (p<0.001), pretreatment transaminase levels (AST) (p=0.022), Child-Pugh subclassification (p=0.003), and dose administered in the tumor (p=0.001). Only one patient had a severe adverse reaction, developing posttreatment liver failure resulting in death. CONCLUSIONS: Radioembolization is safe and efficacious in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver function and the doses received by the tumor are key parameters for the efficacy of treatment. The increase in the scientific evidence supports the inclusion of this technique in treatment guidelines.

Radioembolización en hepatocarcinoma: a propósito de 53 casos / Radioembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a series of 53 cases

Objetivo Contribuir con la presentación de los resultados de nuestro estudio a ampliar la evidencia científica sobre el empleo de la radioembolización en el manejo de pacientes con hepatocarcinoma. Material y método Se trata de una revisión retrospectiva realizada en nuestro centro que incluye a 53 pacientes con hepatocarcinoma tratados con radioembolización. Los pacientes fueron clasificados según el algoritmo del BCLC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer) y de forma pormenorizada por su estado funcional siguiendo la clasificación de Child-Pugh. Se realizó un estudio de supervivencia siguiendo la metodología de Kaplan-Meier. Se empleó el método de regresión de Cox para la determinación de parámetros clínicos significativos, incluyendo dosis administradas en los parámetros estudiados. Resultados La serie evaluada comprende a pacientes con una media de edad de 60 años (rango 28-86). Se llevaron a cabo un total de 61 procedimientos. La actividad media administrada fue de 2,8 GBq (0,7-6,4 GBq), administrando una dosis media en tumor de 229,9 Gy (74-425,9 Gy). El tiempo libre de progresión fue de 6,7 meses desde el momento del tratamiento y la supervivencia global fue de 12,8 meses. La clasificación de los pacientes según BCLC (p=0,848) y Child-Pugh (p=0,252) no resultó significativa respecto al tiempo libre de enfermedad. Los parámetros clínicos que resultaron con diferencias significativas en cuanto a supervivencia global fueron los niveles de bilirrubina (p<0.001) y las cifras de transaminasas (GOT) pretratamiento (p=0.022), la subclasificación Child-Pugh (p=0.003) y la dosis recibida por el tumor (p=0,001). Tan solo uno de los pacientes tratados presentó un efecto adverso grave, con fallo hepático posterapia y resultado de muerte... (AU)

Objective To contribute our results to increase the scientific evidence about the use of radioembolization in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Material and methods This retrospective review included 53 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radioembolization at our center. Patients were classified according to the BCLC algorithm in detail according to their Child-Pugh functional status. We analyzed survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. We used Cox regression analysis to determine clinically significant parameters, including the doses administered in the parameters studied. Results Patients ranged in age from 28 to 86 years (mean, 60 years). A total of 61 procedures were done. The mean activity administered was 2.8 GBq (0.7-6.4 GBq), with a mean dose of 229.9Gy (74-425.9Gy) administered in the tumor. Progression-free survival was 6.7 months and overall survival was 12.8 months. Differences in disease-free survival according to BCLC and Child-Pugh classification were not significant (p=0.848 and p=0.252, respectively). The clinical parameters that were significantly different with respect to overall survival were bilirubin levels (p<0.001), pretreatment transaminase levels (AST) (p=0.022), Child-Pugh subclassification (p=0.003), and dose administered in the tumor (p=0.001). Only one patient had a severe adverse reaction, developing posttreatment liver failure resulting in death. Conclusions Radioembolization is safe and efficacious in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver function and the doses received by the tumor are key parameters for the efficacy of treatment. The increase in the scientific evidence supports the inclusion of this technique in treatment guidelines. (AU)

Biomarcadores asociados con la supervivencia y la respuesta terapéutica a la radioembolización con esferas cargadas de itrio-90 en las metástasis hepáticas del carcinoma colorrectal: nuestra experiencia / Biomarkers associated with survival and favourable outcome of radioembolization with yttrium-90 glass microspheres for colon cancer liver metastases: Single centre experience

Objetivo: Analizar la eficacia terapéutica, seguridad y valor pronóstico de diferentes biomarcadores de la radioembolización transarterial con esferas de itrio-90 (TARE) en pacientes con metástasis hepáticas de cáncer colorrectal. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo que incluye los pacientes con metástasis hepáticas de cancer colorrectal tratados con TARE entre noviembre de 2015 y junio de 2020. Se analizó la respuesta terapéutica (3 y 6 meses, criterios RECIST v1.1) mediante el cálculo de las tasas de respuesta tumoral objetiva (ORR) y de control de la enfermedad (DCR), así como la asociación de los biomarcadores con la respuesta terapéutica y la supervivencia global (SG) y libre de progresión (SLP). Resultados: Treinta TARE en 23 pacientes (edad media 61,61±9,13 años; 56,5% varones). La ORR a los 3 meses fue del 16,7% y el DCR del 53,3%. A los 6 meses progresaron el 80% de los pacientes. La ORR y DCR se asociaron con la edad (p=0,047), tratamiento con bevacizumab (p=0,008), hemoglobina (p=0,008), NLR (p=0,040), albúmina (p=0,012) y GPT (p=0,023) previas a la TARE, y la dosis absorbida tumoral estimada>115Gy (p=0,033). La mediana de SG fue de 12 meses (IC 95%: 4,75-19,25 meses) y de SLP 3 meses (IC 95%: 2,41-3,59 meses). La SG se asoció con la cirugía del tumor primario (p=0,019), mutación KRAS (p=0,024), hemoglobina (p=0,009), NLR (p=0,005) y PLR (p=0,042) previos a la TARE. Conclusión: Los biomarcadores con capacidad para predecir el pronóstico y respuesta terapéutica a la TARE incluyen desde parámetros bioquímicos a factores relacionados con la dosimetría tumoral estimada (AU)

Objetivo: To determine the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases and to evaluate the prognostic value of different biomarkers. Material and methods: This prospective longitudinal study enrolled consecutive patients with CRC liver metastases treated with TARE between November 2015 and june 2020. The therapeutic response at three and six months (RECIST1.1 criteria) and the relationship of biomarkers with therapeutic response, by calculating objective tumor response rates (ORR) and disease control (DCR), and overall survival (OS) and progression-free (PFS). Results: Thirty TAREs were performed in 23 patients (mean age, 61,61±9,13 years; 56,5% male). At three months, the objective response rate (ORR) was 16,7% and the disease control rate (DCR) 53,3%. At six months, the disease progressed in 80%. The ORR and DCR were significantly associated with age at diagnosis (P=.047), previous bevacizumab treatment (P=.008), pre-TARE haemoglobin (P=.008), NLR (P=.040), pre-TARE albumin (P=.012), pre-TARE ALT (P=.023) and tumour-absorbed dose>115Gy (P=.033). Median overall survival (OS) was 12 months (95% CI, 4.75-19.25 months) and median progression-free survival (PFS) 3 months (95% CI, 2.41-3.59). OS was significantly associated with primary tumour resection (P=.019), KRAS mutation (HR: 5.15; P=.024), pre-TARE haemoglobin (HR: .50; p=.009), pre-TARE NLR (HR: 1.65; P=.005) and PLR (HR: 1.01; P=.042). Conclusion: TARE prognosis and therapeutic response were predicted by different biomarkers, ranging from biochemical parameters to tumour dosimetrics (AU)

Biomarkers associated with survival and favourable outcome of radioembolization with yttrium-90 glass microspheres for colon cancer liver metastases: Single centre experience.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases and to evaluate the prognostic value of different biomarkers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective longitudinal study enrolled consecutive patients with CRC liver metastases treated with TARE between November 2015 and june 2020. The therapeutic response at three and six months (RECIST1.1 criteria) and the relationship of biomarkers with therapeutic response, by calculating objective tumor response rates (ORR) and disease control (DCR), and overall survival (OS) and progression-free (PFS). RESULTS: Thirty TAREs were performed in 23 patients (mean age, 61.61 ±â€¯9.13 years; 56.5% male). At three months, the objective response rate (ORR) was 16.7% and the disease control rate (DCR) 53.3%. At six months, the disease progressed in 80%. The ORR and DCR were significantly associated with age at diagnosis (P = 0.047), previous bevacizumab treatment (P = 0.008), pre-TARE haemoglobin (P = 0.008), NLR (P = 0.040), pre-TARE albumin (P = 0.012), pre-TARE ALT (P = 0.023) and tumour-absorbed dose > 115 Gy (P = 0.033). Median overall survival (OS) was 12 months (95% CI, 4.75-19.25 months) and median progression-free survival (PFS) 3 months (95% CI, 2.41-3.59). OS was significantly associated with primary tumour resection (P = 0.019), KRAS mutation (HR: 5.15; P = 0.024), pre-TARE haemoglobin (HR: 0.50; p = 0.009), pre-TARE NLR (HR: 1.65; P = 0.005) and PLR (HR: 1.01; P = 0.042). CONCLUSION: TARE prognosis and therapeutic response were predicted by different biomarkers, ranging from biochemical parameters to tumour dosimetrics.

Radiation exposure of the operators in the preparation and administration of yttrium-90 microspheres in the treatment of malignant hepatic lesions: What is the risk?

Liver radioembolization is an emerging treatment against liver primary and secondary tumours. The whole procedure of radioembolization involves different health care specialists with different expertise. During the fractionation and infusion phases, the personnel manipulates high activities of 90Y. In our centre, the number of radioembolization treatments per year is increasing; the aim of this study is to monitor the dose to the operators and to estimate the radiological risk for the operators involved in the RE. At present, two medical devices are approved: Sir-Sphere® and Therasphere™, both loaded with 90Y. The dosimeters used were TLDs placed over the fingertips, for a total of 4 dosimeters for each phase; the selected dose descriptor was Hp0.07. The study concerned 17 patients affected by malignant hepatic lesions, treated from September 2017 to March 2018. We performed 27 procedures: 10 fractionations (with Sir-Sphere®) and 17 infusions to the patients (10 with Sir-Spheres®, 7 with Theraspheres™). For fractionation phase, the average activity of each preparation was 3.34 GBq, the average value of Hp0.07 was 0.50mSv. For infusion phase, the average activity was 1.51 GBq for Sir-Sphere® and 2.10 GBq for Theraspheres™, the average value of Hp0.07 was 0.10mSv. No significant differences were found between senior (Hp0.07 = 0.08mSv) and young operators (Hp0.07 = 0.09mSv), respectively. Similarly, no significant differences were found between the right and left hand, with the same average value of Hp0.07 (0.01mSv). In conclusion, the results are encouraging, since fingertips reported doses very low. The handling of 90Y microspheres and the radioembolization procedure can be carried out under safe conditions.

Biomarkers associated with survival and favourable outcome of radioembolization with yttrium-90 glass microspheres for colon cancer liver metastases: Single centre experience. / Biomarcadores asociados con la supervivencia y la respuesta terapéutica a la radioembolización con esferas cargadas de itrio-90 en las metástasis hepáticas del carcinoma colorrectal: nuestra experiencia.

OBJETIVE: To determine the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases and to evaluate the prognostic value of different biomarkers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective longitudinal study enrolled consecutive patients with CRC liver metastases treated with TARE between November 2015 and june 2020. The therapeutic response at three and six months (RECIST1.1 criteria) and the relationship of biomarkers with therapeutic response, by calculating objective tumor response rates (ORR) and disease control (DCR), and overall survival (OS) and progression-free (PFS). RESULTS: Thirty TAREs were performed in 23 patients (mean age, 61,61±9,13 years; 56,5% male). At three months, the objective response rate (ORR) was 16,7% and the disease control rate (DCR) 53,3%. At six months, the disease progressed in 80%. The ORR and DCR were significantly associated with age at diagnosis (P=.047), previous bevacizumab treatment (P=.008), pre-TARE haemoglobin (P=.008), NLR (P=.040), pre-TARE albumin (P=.012), pre-TARE ALT (P=.023) and tumour-absorbed dose>115Gy (P=.033). Median overall survival (OS) was 12 months (95% CI, 4.75-19.25 months) and median progression-free survival (PFS) 3 months (95% CI, 2.41-3.59). OS was significantly associated with primary tumour resection (P=.019), KRAS mutation (HR: 5.15; P=.024), pre-TARE haemoglobin (HR: .50; p=.009), pre-TARE NLR (HR: 1.65; P=.005) and PLR (HR: 1.01; P=.042). CONCLUSION: TARE prognosis and therapeutic response were predicted by different biomarkers, ranging from biochemical parameters to tumour dosimetrics.

Efficacy and safety of Yttrium-90 radioembolization in the treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases. Long-term monitoring and impact on survival. / Eficacia y seguridad de la radioembolización con 90Y en el tratamiento de metástasis hepáticas de tumores neuroendocrinos. Seguimiento a largo plazo y repercusión en la supervivencia.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) debut in 75% of cases with liver metastases (LMNETs), whose therapeutic approach includes surgical resection and liver transplantation, while liver radioembolization with 90 Y-microspheres (TARE) is reserved for non-operable patients usually due to high tumor burden. We present the accumulated experience of 10 years in TARE treatment of LMNETs in order to describe the safety and the effectiveness of the oncological response in terms of survival, as well as to detect the prognostic factors involved. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Of 136 TARE procedures, performed between January 2006 and December 2016, 30 LMNETs (11.1%) were retrospectively analyzed. The study variables were: Tumor response, time to liver progression, survival at 3 and 5 years, overall mortality and mortality associated with TARE. The radiological response assessment was assessed using RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria. RESULTS: An average activity of 2.4 ± 1.3 GBq of 90 Y was administered. No patient presented postembolization syndrome or carcinoid syndrome. There were also no vascular complications associated with the procedure. According to RECIST 1.1 criteria at 6 months, 78.6% presented partial response and 21.4% stable disease, there was no progression or complete response (1 by mRECIST). Survival at 3 and 5 years was 73% in both cases. CONCLUSION: TARE treatment with 90 Y-microspheres in LMNETs, applied within a multidisciplinary approach, is a safe procedure, with low morbidity, capable of achieving a high rate of radiological response and achieving lasting tumor responses.

Radioembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a series of 53 cases. / Radioembolización de hepatocarcinomas: a propósito de 53 casos.

OBJECTIVE: To contribute our results to increase the scientific evidence about the use of radioembolization in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 53 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radioembolization at our center. Patients were classified according to the BCLC algorithm in detail according to their Child-Pugh functional status. We analyzed survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. We used Cox regression analysis to determine clinically significant parameters, including the doses administered in the parameters studied. RESULTS: Patients ranged in age from 28 to 86 years (mean, 60 years). A total of 61 procedures were done. The mean activity administered was 2.8 GBq (0.7-6.4 GBq), with a mean dose of 229.9Gy (74-425.9Gy) administered in the tumor. Progression-free survival was 6.7 months and overall survival was 12.8 months. Differences in disease-free survival according to BCLC and Child-Pugh classification were not significant (p=0.848 and p=0.252, respectively). The clinical parameters that were significantly different with respect to overall survival were bilirubin levels (p<0.001), pretreatment transaminase levels (AST) (p=0.022), Child-Pugh subclassification (p=0.003), and dose administered in the tumor (p=0.001). Only one patient had a severe adverse reaction, developing posttreatment liver failure resulting in death. CONCLUSIONS: Radioembolization is safe and efficacious in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver function and the doses received by the tumor are key parameters for the efficacy of treatment. The increase in the scientific evidence supports the inclusion of this technique in treatment guidelines.

Radioembolization in liver tumours. / Radioembolización en tumores hepáticos.

The detection of malignant liver tumours is recently increasing. These lesions have frequently arterial vascularization which differs from healthy parenchyma with main portal flow making them especially susceptible to transarterial therapies. Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE) is an emerging treatment for the management of different liver tumours. Significant improvements in the procedure have been made so it is considered a safe and effective treatment. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary because of the complexity of the procedure. An optimal selection of the patients and good planning arteriography are essential to obtain benefit and reduce complication rate. Although TARE has been used mostly in hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases, indications are currently in expansion as the only treatment or in combination.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: Present and future. / Carcinoma hepatocelular: presente y futuro.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide with over 740,000 new cases per year and the third leading cause of cancer-related death, with a growing incidence in recent years. This tumor usually arises in patients with an underlying chronic liver disease. The management of this tumor has improved over the past 2 decades: patients at risk are included in a surveillance program, a prognostic staging system has been created and, finally, new treatments particularly aimed at patients with advanced HCC have been developed. This fact has resulted in a greater interest in this tumor and several scientific societies have developed clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with this disease. In this article, we review the current and future prospects of this tumor.

Hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: ablation and arterial embolization. / Tratamiento del hepatocarcinoma: ablación y embolización arterial.

Percutaneous and endovascular techniques take an important role in the therapeutic management of patients with hepatocarcinoma. Different techniques of percutaneous ablation, especially indicated in tumors up to 2cm diameter offer, at least, similar results to surgical resection. Taking advantage of double hepatic vascularization and exclusive tumor nutrition by the artery, several endovascular techniques of treating the tumor have been developed. Intra-arterial administration of embolizing particles, alone or charged with drug (chemoembolization), will produce ischemia and consequent necrosis with excellent results in selected patients. Certain types of particles may exclusively be carriers of a therapeutic agent when they incorporate a radioisotope that facilitates the direct intratumoral selective irradiation (radioembolization). This technique has demonstrated its efficacy in lesions not susceptible to be treated with other methods and should be considered, together with ablation and chemoembolization, in the therapeutic algorithms of hepatocarcinoma.

Downstaging of bilobar hepatocellular carcinoma after radioembolization with 90Y microspheres as a bridge to liver transplantation. / Downstaging de carcinoma hepatocelular bilobar tras radioembolización con microesferas de 90Y como puente al trasplante hepático.

Hepatic radioembolization with 90Y is an increasingly widely used locoregional therapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Its potential benefit has recently been described as a downstaging treatment, achieving a decreased tumour burden and allowing patients to be rescued for more radical treatments, such as liver transplantation. The case is presented of a patient diagnosed with multifocal bilobar hepatocellular carcinoma, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) intermediate stage, in whom treatment with 90Y achieved a satisfactory radiological response with a very significant reduction of tumour burden, allowing rescue with liver transplantation.

[Survival benefit with intraarterial techniques in hepatocellular carcinoma]. / Beneficio sobre la supervivencia con las técnicas intraarteriales en el carcinoma hepatocelular.

The two intraarterial techniques used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are the transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radioembolization (RE). TACE includes various procedures whose objective is to expose tumor cells to a chemotherapy agent and induce acute ischemia in the tumor. The survival benefit obtained by adding a chemotherapy agent or lipiodol to simple particle embolization has not been demonstrated in 2 meta-analyses, which suggests that the antitumor effect is primarily ischemic. RE is a form of brachytherapy that consists of an intraarterial injection of microspheres loaded with yttrium 90 as the source of radiation, a pure beta emitter with a mean tissue penetration of 2mm. TACE is performed in several sessions every 4-8 weeks, while RE is generally a single procedure. The guidelines adopted by the main research societies support the use of TACE for the palliative treatment of patients with intermediate stage HCC. This is a level 1 recommendation based on the positive results of 2 randomized clinical trials and 3 meta-analyses and on several uncontrolled studies with thousands of patients with unresectable HCC. Survival in clinical practice studies is heterogeneous due to the heterogeneity of the treated population. The survival rate varies from 8% to 26% at 5 years, and the median is 16-40 months in the early stage and 15-27 months in the intermediate stage. TACE with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) has not shown superiority versus conventional TACE in terms of improved survival or tumor response, but it decreases the severe chemotherapy-related adverse events. One of its advantages is the standardization of the procedure, while its primary disadvantage is the onset of biliary complications when used nonselectively. There is level 2 evidence to support the use of RE in HCC, evidence that comes from patient cohorts with consistent results and case-control studies. The treated population includes mainly patients with unresectable tumors, who are considered suboptimal candidates for TACE or are progressing toward this condition, and those for whom TACE was directly contraindicated by the presence of portal vein thrombosis. Consequently, these patients tend to have large or extensively bilobar tumors and other factors for a poor prognosis. The overall survival reported for patients in the intermediate and advanced stages is 16-18 months and 7-17 months, respectively. A number of retrospective studies have reported comparable survival for patients treated with TACE and RE in the same institution; however, these results should be interpreted as a generator of ideas and not as an equivalent efficacy test. Although the combination of systemic agents such as sorafenib with intraarterial techniques is attractive, the results to date are not encouraging. In the only available randomized trial that compared the combination of a continuous regimen of sorafenib started before the first session of DEB-TACE versus DEB-TACE alone, neither the time to progression nor the overall survival were significantly different between the 2 groups. TACE and RE are contraindicated in cases of decompensated cirrhosis. TACE is also contraindicated for patients with considerable tumor burden in whom the procedure cannot be performed selectively and in patients with portal vein invasion.